What exactly is the problem with healthcare in america?
Labels:
skin care 09 articles
Dave M
I am to help contribute to a group project, my responsibility is to discuss the "status-quo" solution to the economic healthcare problem. Any suggestions as far as resources i could use, or any personal knowledge?
Answer
NOTHING that can't be fixed cheaper than 10 trillion dollars! That is what it will cost by the end of 10 years...it is set in stone. To cover 9 million more people...
And those that think health care is important ..why isn't it important for EVERYONE THEN..not just 9 million more ? WHy not EVERYONE? People cannot afford health care now cannot afford it then...and to spend 10 trillion dollars on 9 milion people is RIDICULOUS!
There is much you can do to change health care expenses...but the dems won't have any part of it. They have shut off phone and emails so you can't complain...they wont' listen...THEY HAVE AGENDAS and to HELL with everyone else!
THIS IS NOT GOVERNMENTAL RESPONSIBLITY..it is a personal one...and we are not like other nations...and it is not good enough for other nations.
This is why europe's health care is not so great..
For all types of cancers, European men have only a 47.3 percent five-year survival rate, compared to 66.3 percent survival rate for American men. The greatest disparity was in prostate cancer, which American men are 28 percent more likely to survive than European men.
European women are only 55.8 percent likely to live five years after contracting any kind of cancer, compared to 62.9 percent for American women.
In five cancers -- breast, prostate, thyroid, testicular and skin melanoma -- American survival rates are higher than 90 percent. Europeans hit a 90 percent survival rate for only one of those -- testicular cancer.
Most disturbingly, many cancers in Europe are discovered only upon the victim's death -- twice as many as in the U.S. Consequently, the European study simply excluded cancers that were first noted on the death certificate, so as not to give the U.S. too great an advantage.
There are still a lot of people on here that think this is FREE HEALTH CARE and don't realize they have to pay for this. WHAT A WAKE UP CALL when they have to pay...plus pay the high taxes. Canada alone pays over half their pay check to health care...you think health care is expensive now..wait and see what it is.
Then you get AMNESTY...in MAY of next year...yep...MILLIONS MORE TO COVER..and YOU PAY FOR IT because it is on a sliding scale fee. You can pay 10,000 dollars for the same thing someone is paying 50 bucks a month for.!
FAIR? NOPE...but the dems think so because they are too busy spending their money on things they cannot do without such as psp's cell phones etc..instead of taking care of their lives and living within a budget!
CANADA is changing their health care to allow privatized health care because their system is broke and they told BOZO NOT TO DO THIS!
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/09/socialized_medicine_is_broken.html
http://www.city-journal.org/html/17_3_canadian_healthcare.html
http://74.125.93.132/search?q=cache:dpfF8AkeN1YJ:www.propeller.com/story/2009/08/17/canadian-health-care-system-ready-to-implode/+canada+ready+to+implode&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
This is why europe's health care is not so great..
For all types of cancers, European men have only a 47.3 percent five-year survival rate, compared to 66.3 percent survival rate for American men. The greatest disparity was in prostate cancer, which American men are 28 percent more likely to survive than European men.
European women are only 55.8 percent likely to live five years after contracting any kind of cancer, compared to 62.9 percent for American women.
In five cancers -- breast, prostate, thyroid, testicular and skin melanoma -- American survival rates are higher than 90 percent. Europeans hit a 90 percent survival rate for only one of those -- testicular cancer.
Most disturbingly, many cancers in Europe are discovered only upon the victim's death -- twice as many as in the U.S. Consequently, the European study simply excluded cancers that were first noted on the death certificate, so as not to give the U.S. too great an advantage.
DO WE LISTEN? NOPE...DEMS DO NOT HAVE EARS OR A BRAIN BETWEEN WHAT SHOULD BE EARS!
NOTHING that can't be fixed cheaper than 10 trillion dollars! That is what it will cost by the end of 10 years...it is set in stone. To cover 9 million more people...
And those that think health care is important ..why isn't it important for EVERYONE THEN..not just 9 million more ? WHy not EVERYONE? People cannot afford health care now cannot afford it then...and to spend 10 trillion dollars on 9 milion people is RIDICULOUS!
There is much you can do to change health care expenses...but the dems won't have any part of it. They have shut off phone and emails so you can't complain...they wont' listen...THEY HAVE AGENDAS and to HELL with everyone else!
THIS IS NOT GOVERNMENTAL RESPONSIBLITY..it is a personal one...and we are not like other nations...and it is not good enough for other nations.
This is why europe's health care is not so great..
For all types of cancers, European men have only a 47.3 percent five-year survival rate, compared to 66.3 percent survival rate for American men. The greatest disparity was in prostate cancer, which American men are 28 percent more likely to survive than European men.
European women are only 55.8 percent likely to live five years after contracting any kind of cancer, compared to 62.9 percent for American women.
In five cancers -- breast, prostate, thyroid, testicular and skin melanoma -- American survival rates are higher than 90 percent. Europeans hit a 90 percent survival rate for only one of those -- testicular cancer.
Most disturbingly, many cancers in Europe are discovered only upon the victim's death -- twice as many as in the U.S. Consequently, the European study simply excluded cancers that were first noted on the death certificate, so as not to give the U.S. too great an advantage.
There are still a lot of people on here that think this is FREE HEALTH CARE and don't realize they have to pay for this. WHAT A WAKE UP CALL when they have to pay...plus pay the high taxes. Canada alone pays over half their pay check to health care...you think health care is expensive now..wait and see what it is.
Then you get AMNESTY...in MAY of next year...yep...MILLIONS MORE TO COVER..and YOU PAY FOR IT because it is on a sliding scale fee. You can pay 10,000 dollars for the same thing someone is paying 50 bucks a month for.!
FAIR? NOPE...but the dems think so because they are too busy spending their money on things they cannot do without such as psp's cell phones etc..instead of taking care of their lives and living within a budget!
CANADA is changing their health care to allow privatized health care because their system is broke and they told BOZO NOT TO DO THIS!
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/09/socialized_medicine_is_broken.html
http://www.city-journal.org/html/17_3_canadian_healthcare.html
http://74.125.93.132/search?q=cache:dpfF8AkeN1YJ:www.propeller.com/story/2009/08/17/canadian-health-care-system-ready-to-implode/+canada+ready+to+implode&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
This is why europe's health care is not so great..
For all types of cancers, European men have only a 47.3 percent five-year survival rate, compared to 66.3 percent survival rate for American men. The greatest disparity was in prostate cancer, which American men are 28 percent more likely to survive than European men.
European women are only 55.8 percent likely to live five years after contracting any kind of cancer, compared to 62.9 percent for American women.
In five cancers -- breast, prostate, thyroid, testicular and skin melanoma -- American survival rates are higher than 90 percent. Europeans hit a 90 percent survival rate for only one of those -- testicular cancer.
Most disturbingly, many cancers in Europe are discovered only upon the victim's death -- twice as many as in the U.S. Consequently, the European study simply excluded cancers that were first noted on the death certificate, so as not to give the U.S. too great an advantage.
DO WE LISTEN? NOPE...DEMS DO NOT HAVE EARS OR A BRAIN BETWEEN WHAT SHOULD BE EARS!
Why no outrage over Harry Reid Comments?
bobby s
Why is it that, other than some republicans, no one seems to care about Harry Reid's comments about Obama's skin color and dialect in his book? Most African American people in congress and even Al Sharpton are defending Reid.
But back in 2002 when Majority Leader Trent Lott made some in insensitive comments at a birthday party, he was run out of congress.
Harry Reid comments: no big deal. Trent Lott comments: Huge deal and he loses his job.
Why the difference?
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2010/01/09/national/w110215S26.DTL
Answer
He holds the key to the health care bill and all Democrats think that if this fails so does Obama's presidency and hence the fall of Democrats like was done by Carter.
It was 16 years after Carter was elected that we got another Democratic president. They don't want to see this again. The problem seems to be the same reasons for Carter as it is for Obama... no jobs and he didn't address it, but other things instead.
They are really propping up Obama and not Reid. They have to keep this bill going and an interruption by the house leader being canned would probably mean the downfall of the health care bill as everyone will be wondering if they know what they are doing. It just brings to the front all this "back room" secret dealings on the health care bill that no one knows about... and here we have Reid that said that without anyone knowing until someone spilt the secret beans.
He holds the key to the health care bill and all Democrats think that if this fails so does Obama's presidency and hence the fall of Democrats like was done by Carter.
It was 16 years after Carter was elected that we got another Democratic president. They don't want to see this again. The problem seems to be the same reasons for Carter as it is for Obama... no jobs and he didn't address it, but other things instead.
They are really propping up Obama and not Reid. They have to keep this bill going and an interruption by the house leader being canned would probably mean the downfall of the health care bill as everyone will be wondering if they know what they are doing. It just brings to the front all this "back room" secret dealings on the health care bill that no one knows about... and here we have Reid that said that without anyone knowing until someone spilt the secret beans.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
Post a Comment